Jira Usage Help
The purpose of this page is to help the community of Zephyr Project users and developers to understand how the Zephyr Project intends Jira to be used.
Zephyr Project's Jiras
The Zephyr Project uses three different Jira databases which are accessible from the Zephyr System Dashboard.
You can also go directly to each Jira project by following these links:
When creating or looking for issues, be sure you're using the correct Jira project.
Jira Issue Type Descriptions
The information below describing the differences between Epics, Stories, Tasks, Bugs, and Subtasks is provided so users can understand when to create each and how to properly relate them to one another.
- The smallest unit of feature-development work that is planned and tracked to deliver an increment of functionality to the product. Generally, the granularity of a story is days to a few weeks to complete.
- Typically written using the following format:
- “As a <type_of_user>, I want <goal> so that I <receive_benefit>.”
- Must always include specific and measurable acceptance criteria.
- Large stories (with granularity of more than a few weeks to complete) should be split into smaller stories.
- May or may not be associated with an epic. Some stories are self-contained one-offs.
- Something which is not a story, but is nontrivial and needs to be completed. It is NOT implementation of a feature in the product; that should be captured as a story. It’s generally something that does not: (1) involve writing/changing code to implement a new or changed feature, and (2) performing the necessary testing associated with (1).
- If the work to be done requires writing/changing code of the product, it must be captured as a story, not a task.
- Generally, the granularity of a task is days to a few weeks to complete.
- Because code-related states are not applicable, tasks have a simpler workflow.
- Because tasks take developers’ time they are tracked in efforts to better understand resource availability and loading.
- May or may not be associated with an epic.
- Good examples of a task would be:
- Planning-related work (e.g. design work needed before being able to specify, scope, or estimate the size of a story)
- Research work needed for an upcoming feature
- Proof-of-Concept work where the code created for the POC is not yet part of the product.
- Note: Adding the features/functionality demonstrated by a POC to the product would be done within the context of a story.
- Architectural Study
- A reported problem with already-released functionality. In other words, something broken in a released version of the project (like v1.5.0), OR
- A reported problem with already-merged, but not yet released, functionality. In other words, something that’s already been implemented, merged, and tested to meet acceptance criteria, but then is later found to be broken before it is released in a version of the product (like a v1.x.0 which is in-progress of being developed).
- May or may not be associated with an epic.
- Significantly larger bodies of work than Stories, Tasks, or Bugs. For example, an epic may take a few months to complete.
- A body of work that is almost always delivered over a set of sprints or releases during which its scope may be modified as the team learns more about the Epic through development and customer feedback.
- Work that is comprised of many Stories, Tasks, and/or Bugs. Due to its large scope, epics must always be “split up” into smaller stories, tasks, or bugs to incrementally deliver desired results.
- Epics are used to group together related work (Stories, Tasks, and/or Bugs).
- Smaller work items of a story, task, or bug.
- Always associated with a story, task, or bug.
- Sub-tasks themselves are not planned and tracked like stories, tasks, and bugs are.
- Sub-tasks are available for use by developers to keep themselves organized by specifying and tracking their lower-level work.
- Generally, the granularity of a subtask is hours or days to complete.
Hierarchy of and Relationships Between the Different Issue Types
The hierarchy diagram shown below is not meant to show every possible relationship between Epics, Stories, Tasks, and Bugs that can be created using Jira’s link feature (accessible via the More→Link button when viewing an issue).
- An Epic may have Stories, Tasks, and/or Bugs associated with it. Bugs are less likely to be associated with an Epic, but it is possible if some bug fixing is relevant to an Epic and it’s desired that the set of bugs get tracked with the Epic.
- A Story, Task, or Bug can only be associated with one and only one Epic, but may not be associated with any Epic at all.
- Subtasks are optionally used to identify lower-level work associated with Stories, Tasks, or Bugs.
- Subtasks cannot be directly associated to Epics.
- Subtasks cannot be created standalone; they must be associated with higher-level Stories, Tasks, or Bugs.
Real Examples in Jira
To see real examples of the relationships and hierarchy, open this Jira board (https://jira.zephyrproject.org/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=18&view=planning.nodetail), then open the EPICS panel by clicking on the 'Show epics panel' link to the left of the issues list.
With the EPICS panel open Jira shows the Epic associated with each issue in the Backlog. See the arrows on the right below. On the left, in the red box, is the list of Epics associated with all of the issues in the Backlog. By clicking on an Epic in the EPICS panel on the left, the list of issues associated with the Epic is shown in the Backlog panel on the right. Open an issue to find subtasks, where they are being used. Not all issues have subtasks.
The meanings of the three different priority levels are as follows:
|Priority Level||When used in Stories and Tasks||When used in Bugs|
|High||Must-Have in planned release||Must be fixed in the next release|
|Medium||Should-Have in planned release||Should be fixed in the next release|
|Low||Nice-to-Have in planned release||Nice to be fixed in the next release|
|Undecided||Priority has not been decided|